• Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
BigMoneyHall.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Latest News
Latest News

Minor, faceless federal officials would be stripped of their power to regulate in new bipartisan bill

by January 17, 2023
by January 17, 2023

A bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a bill last week aimed at preventing minor federal officials who were never confirmed by the Senate from imposing billions of dollars of regulatory costs on Americans each year.

The ‘Ensuring Accountability in Agency Rulemaking Act’ was put forward by Reps. Ben Cline, R-Va., Jared Golden, D-Maine, and a handful of other Republicans last week. The bill is an attempt to ensure all federal regulations are legally initiated and issued by federal officials who are Senate-confirmed and thus more accountable to American voters.

Cline said too many regulations are released by minor agency officials, which has led to myriad new rules that contribute to soaring federal mandates, which he said costs 10% of America’s gross domestic product each year.

‘The problem is across the board,’ Cline told Fox News Digital. ‘It’s just in varying degrees, depending on which agency you’re dealing with.’

The bill is a response to a 2019 study by the Pacific Legal Foundation, which found that 98% of all rules that came out of the Department of Health and Human Services’ (HHS) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2001 and 2017 were issued ‘illegally’ by non-Senate confirmed officials and that other agencies had similar problems. The study found that 25 of those rules had an economic impact of more than $100 million and that the FDA’s high incidence of rules issued by minor officials meant that more than 70% of all HHS rules were ‘unconstitutional.’

Joe Luppino-Esposito, deputy legal policy director at the foundation, said his group has been involved in lawsuits against federal rules that are not issued properly, which has forced some agencies to go back and get sign-off from appointed officials.

The legal theory underpinning this effort is that the Constitution’s Appointments Clause requires senior appointed officials to impose regulatory burdens on Americans, a view the foundation says has been supported by a few Supreme Court cases: Buckley v. Valeo in 1976 and Edmond v. United States in 1997. The foundation says those cases backed the idea that ‘only principal agency officers (like department heads and assistant secretaries confirmed by the Senate) may issue regulations that have the force of law.’

Luppino-Esposito said the bipartisan nature of Cline’s bill shows that ‘people on both sides of the aisle are recognizing’ the problem of ceding too much authority to minor, unknown officials who aren’t directly accountable to the people.

Cline said he and Golden joined the House Problem Solvers’ Caucus at the same time and that they both agree on the need to address this growing issue.

‘We both share an outlook on overreaching executive branch authority, and I think we’re trying to solve a problem here that’s gotten … to be a significant program and is affecting the daily lives of Americans,’ he said.

Cline also predicted that new House Republican leadership would be interested in moving the bill soon.

‘Leadership is going to be interested in setting down markers on overreaching by the executive branch, and so they’ve looked to bills like this one that have statistics and facts and figured to back them up, so hopefully we’ll see this move fairly early,’ he said.

Under the bill, most federal rules would have to be ‘issued and signed by an individual appointed by the president, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate.’ The bill also holds that rules must be initiated by these senior officials.

Pete Kasperowicz is a politics editor at Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
0 comment
0
FacebookTwitterPinterestEmail

previous post
RNC chair race: McDaniel rolls out list of roughly 150 major donors backing her re-election
next post
Indiana Rep. Jim Banks launches 2024 Senate run, highlights record as ‘conservative fighter’

Related Posts

Vermont weighing legal protections for providers of abortion,...

February 1, 2023

‘Anti-religious bigotry’: Nebraska Dem’s amdt. would ban kids...

February 1, 2023

Virginia bill would ban transgender athletes from women’s...

February 1, 2023

Pennsylvania Democrats endorse Philly appellate judge for state...

February 1, 2023

How a group of Democrats and Republicans could...

February 1, 2023

Maine Gov. Mills to give budget address on...

February 1, 2023

Biden approval ratings remain well underwater, far below...

February 1, 2023

House ignores White House objections, votes to end...

February 1, 2023

Tim Scott, Cory Booker still hoping for bipartisan...

January 31, 2023

Biden tells Congress he’ll end COVID-19 emergencies on...

January 31, 2023
Enter Your Information Below To Receive Free Trading Ideas, Latest News, And Articles.


Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

Recent Posts

  • Vermont weighing legal protections for providers of abortion, trans procedures

    February 1, 2023
  • ‘Anti-religious bigotry’: Nebraska Dem’s amdt. would ban kids from vacation Bible schools, church youth groups

    February 1, 2023
  • Virginia bill would ban transgender athletes from women’s sports

    February 1, 2023
  • Pennsylvania Democrats endorse Philly appellate judge for state Supreme Court seat

    February 1, 2023
  • How a group of Democrats and Republicans could bypass McCarthy and lift the debt ceiling

    February 1, 2023
  • Maine Gov. Mills to give budget address on Valentine’s Day

    February 1, 2023

Editors’ Picks

  • 1

    New Mexico top prosecutor shifts focus to addressing child civil rights

    January 16, 2023
  • 2

    Noem blocks South Dakota business with certain companies owned or controlled by ‘evil foreign governments’

    January 20, 2023
  • 3

    Group backing Ron DeSantis to spend $3.3M to make him the Republican nominee over Donald Trump in 2024: report

    January 19, 2023
  • 4

    Democrat leadership leaves Adam Schiff hanging on call for intelligence assessment of Biden’s classified docs

    January 16, 2023
  • 5

    Schiff, Swalwell, Omar respond after Speaker McCarthy keeps them off committees: ‘Political vengeance’

    January 25, 2023
  • 6

    Indiana Rep. Jim Banks launches 2024 Senate run, highlights record as ‘conservative fighter’

    January 17, 2023
  • 7

    New York City Mayor Eric Adams demands ‘national czar’ for migrant surge, a role VP Kamala Harris already has

    January 18, 2023

Categories

  • Economy (13)
  • Editor's Pick (16)
  • Investing (13)
  • Latest News (409)
  • Stock (62)

Latest News

  • Combining Price Structure, MACD & ADX

    January 26, 2023
  • DC poised to soften penalties for carjacking, other violent crimes, despite mayor’s veto

    January 16, 2023
  • These 4 senators are the most likely to lose their seats in 2024

    January 31, 2023

Investing News

  • Biden admin cites data showing new border measures ‘are working,’ as new lawsuit looms

    January 26, 2023
  • John Kerry says climate threat calls for wartime urgency: ‘Turn factories into solar panel producers’

    January 18, 2023
  • Connecticut Gov. Lamont calls for more gun bans, higher buying age

    January 27, 2023
  • About Us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer: BigMoneyHall.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2023 BigMoneyHall.com. All Rights Reserved.

BigMoneyHall.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
BigMoneyHall.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Latest News
BigMoneyHall.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Economy
BigMoneyHall.com – Investing and Stock News
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Latest News

Disclaimer: BigMoneyHall.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

Copyright © 2023 BigMoneyHall.com. All Rights Reserved.

Read alsox

DeSantis fights back against White House, defends...

January 24, 2023

MN Gov. Walz proposes $300M for public...

January 24, 2023

Border crisis: Texas sheriff requests aide from...

January 20, 2023